| Patent Agent Finder |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| The PatentlyProtected.com |
IP Tutor |
||||||||||||||
| IP Q&A Forum |
|||||||||||||||
| IP Links |
|||||||||||||||
| Territory Planner Tool |
|||||||||||||||
| Back to Patent Questions Index |
Ask a question... |
||||||||||||||
| What is the difference between "first-to-file" and a "first-to-invent" systems of patenting? In most of the countries a patent or invention which is filed or registered first in the patent office will have precedence to the patent or invention which is filed later in date even if it had been invented earlier (First-to-file). However, the practice is different in USA. If an inventor or a patent holder can prove that the invention or patent had been conceived earlier but could not be filed in Patent Office earlier, the US law will favour it and give/precedence to the invention or patent which even had been filed earlier (first-to-invent). Filing first necessarily will not entitle an invention or patent precedence in USA. The USA view and culture in the US is that first-to-invent system, is inventor friendly system. |
|||||||||||||||
| © 2005 PatentlyProtected.com All rights reserved Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, an offer, an offer to treat or a legal relationship. Always check with your IP consultant. |
|||||||||||||||