| Patent Agent Finder |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| The PatentlyProtected.com |
IP Tutor |
||||||||||||||
| IP Q&A Forum |
|||||||||||||||
| IP Links |
|||||||||||||||
| Territory Planner Tool |
|||||||||||||||
| Back to Patent Questions Index |
Ask a question... |
||||||||||||||
| What are the pro' and con's of the European Patent Office's (EPO's) ‘problem-solution’ approach to patent inventiveness? The “problem-solution” approach is the approach, normally used by the EPO to assess the inventive step, based on an image of the invention as a solution to a problem.: An advantage of this approach is that it provides a degree of certainty to the assessment of inventive step, with objectivity, economy and transparency and this approach may be applied in nearly all situations. It is however clear that this approach is not the only one that should be considered. The case may be inappropriate where there is no close prior art from which to formulate the problem, i.e. when the invention breaks new ground. Indeed, in Alcan/Aluminium Alloys, the TBA pointed out that Rule 27(1) on which this approach is based, is concerned solely with the formulation of the description, rather than the assessment of the inventive step under Art.56EPC. |
|||||||||||||||
| © 2005 PatentlyProtected.com All rights reserved Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, an offer, an offer to treat or a legal relationship. Always check with your IP consultant. |
|||||||||||||||