| Patent Agent Finder |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| The PatentlyProtected.com |
IP Tutor |
||||||||||||||
| IP Q&A Forum |
|||||||||||||||
| IP Links |
|||||||||||||||
| Territory Planner Tool |
|||||||||||||||
| Back to Patent Questions Index |
Ask a question... |
||||||||||||||
| How does the European Patent Office determine "inventive step" using the "problem and solution" approach? The “problem-solution” approach is used by the EPO to assess the inventive step, which consists in three steps: -determining which document is the closest prior art, -establishing the technical problem to be solved, and -considering whether, starting from the closest prior art, the claimed invention would have been obvious to the man skilled in the art. In Alcan/Aluminium Alloys the Technical Board of Appeal pointed out that Rule 27(1) on which this approach is based, is concerned solely with the formulation of the description, rather than the assessment of the inventive step, and that this approach the problem and solution approach should be considered as one amongst other possible approaches, each of which has its own advantages and drawbacks. |
|||||||||||||||
| © 2005 PatentlyProtected.com All rights reserved Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, an offer, an offer to treat or a legal relationship. Always check with your IP consultant. |
|||||||||||||||