| Patent Agent Finder |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| The PatentlyProtected.com |
IP Tutor |
||||||||||||||
| IP Q&A Forum |
|||||||||||||||
| IP Links |
|||||||||||||||
| Territory Planner Tool |
|||||||||||||||
| Back to Patent Questions Index |
Ask a question... |
||||||||||||||
| I had a UK patent drafted, is it suitable for all countries designated on a PCT application? Naturally some countries may require a translation in their language fairly soon after entering the "national phase". The PCT leaves each Contracting State free to prescribe such substantive conditions of patentability as it desires. This is particularly true of what constitutes “prior art.” However, since the requirements of prior art, as defined in the PCT and its Regulations for the purposes of the international phase are generally as strict as, or stricter than, those defined in any national law, the chances of unpleasant surprises by way of previously uncited prior art references being raised during the national phase are substantially reduced. An example of what else may be needed in other territories is the "Best known disclosure" required in the US. In general there are some phrases which are permissable under UK law, but not abroad, and those will have to be deleted (E.g. so called Omnibus claims). Conversely there are some phrases which are desirable in other states such as the US, and they would need to be included in the UK application because it is not possible to add subject matter after the "priority date". (Of course, because these phrases may not be permissable under UK law you need to file with them in - then delete them, and then file the PCT application with them in again). |
|||||||||||||||
| © 2005 PatentlyProtected.com All rights reserved Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice, an offer, an offer to treat or a legal relationship. Always check with your IP consultant. |
|||||||||||||||